Highlights
Quality
A little easier to get into than foundation since you understand where he is going with the series now.
Asimov created a master piece with the foundation series and this second book is the staple that holds it together.
But that didn't detract from the quality of the story for me.
Asimov throws a wrench into the status quo with the rise of a mutant, a statistical improbability and anomaly that could not po... Read More
Price
Asimov is one of the great's of science fiction.
Competitiveness
It's not the best writing in the world, but it's far from the worst.
Asimov treats history like a marxist, influenced by hegelian dialectics.
Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
first, second, great, future and two. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
- Our engine has discovered that over 90% high quality reviews are present.
- This product had a total of 3,025 reviews as of our last analysis date on Sep 26 2021.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It is so good it is unlikely that anyone will ever make a successful movie out of it
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Foundation and empire by isaac asimov 55 starsi had to read the sequel to foundation after i had read it
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Psychohistory deals only in general social and economic trends
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Asimov seems to be adept at using characters’ interaction and dialogue to construct plots with meaning
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It makes for very entertaining reading but the delivery of events outside of dialogue and understanding between the characters is absent as a result
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Seldons analysis determines the current empire is going to collapse
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It isnt by any means realistic
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The notion that someone could predict the statistical motion of vast numbers of people is perhaps reasonable but that the analysis would be good for 1000 years despite massive changes in technology is doubtful at best