What does this mean?Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
great, good, made, animal and disposable. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.
- Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 66.2% of the reviews are reliable.
- This product had a total of 71 reviews as of our last analysis date on May 27 2020.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
When you consider the cost of the 3 or more blades its really just not worth it
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
We will probably buy this item from this seller again
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Maybe not the best but then you start running into the get what you pay for scenario
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Too bad the handle that uses them is being phased out
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
What i do after shaving rinse the blade briefly with warm water to remove all remaining soap and hair then shake off the water and the briefly blot on a towel
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Slate magazine has an article on comparing the carbon footprint of disposable razors versus an electric shaver
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Their assessment doesn’t factor in the material waste of broken electric razors and landfill waste is arguably a bigger issue when comparing the options
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Another reason for switching to preserve is that the company does no animal testing while gillette have had long battles with peta over their animal testing and although the gillette razors don’t involve animal testing to my knowledge the company is owned by pg which still does some animal testing
Review Count History
Add Fakespot to your browser, Secure Shopping on the go.
Download Fakespot for Browsers
