What does this mean?This is the last analysis snapshot initiated on Apr 16, 2019.
Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
atheist, most, each and intellectual. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
- Our engine has discovered that over 90% high quality reviews are present.
- This product had a total of 16 reviews as of our last analysis date on Apr 16 2019.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I bought this out of curiosity wondering what it would be like to read a multipart adjudicated debate
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
If you want a pedantically rigorous series of academic expositions this isnt it
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Anyone interested in the ongoing debate over the existence of gods will also get something out of it even if it only reinforces your current perspective
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Some things to look forward to discussion of advanced alien beings thats rational not ancient aliens
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I do think the judges were missing the point on saltorellis argument from initial error but in the end it didnt matter
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I appreciated the commentary from each of the judges sometimes it helped to clarify something i missed and sometimes it guided both participants to clarify something that each judge misunderstood
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It is impossible for us to talk each other into or out of faith but it does not mean that one of the central questions of human existence cannot be examined in a proper manner
Review Count History
Price History
Add Fakespot to your browser, Secure Shopping on the go.
Download Fakespot for Browsers
