Propet Mens Cliff Walker Medicare/HCPCS Code = A5500 Diabetic Shoe

Analyzed on

1,354Total Reviews

Hiking Boots

C

Company Review Grade:

Propét

990 Total Products

Propet Mens Cliff Walker Medicare/HCPCS Code = A5500 Diabetic Shoe

Analyzed on

Sold by Propét

C

Fakespot review grade

C

This analysis is outdated. Please reanalyze.

Ask Fakespot Chat questions about this productAlpha

Initializing Fakespot Chat

System error,

Loading suggested questions

Suggested Questions

No suggested questions were found

Please note: The content is generated by an AI language model based on reviews. We are constantly improving the accuracy, however, its outputs may contain errors or offensive content from certain reviews. Please report any errors or offensive content to us. Also, please note that we will not collect your questions unless you click the thumbs up/down button to provide feedback. The answers displayed will be stored by us so if another Fakespotter asks a similar question we can provide them an answer faster. Your feedback will only help us make Fakespot Chat better! By using Fakespot Chat, you agree to Fakespot's terms of use and privacy notice.

Pros & Cons

Update Pros and Cons

The AI used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

pros

See Details

pros

Features with many positive mentions

See Details

Comfortability

Customers rave about the comfortability of these Propet Diabetic Shoes, with many stating they provide excellent support and relief from foot pain. Some customers specifically mention the shoes' deep treads and water resistance as additional benefits. However, a small minority have had mixed experiences with the brand in the past but still find these shoes to be comfortable and worth purchasing.

neutral

See Details

neutral

Frequently mentioned features with split sentiment

See Details

Fit

Customers have mixed opinions on the fit of these diabetic shoes, with most expressing satisfaction and some reporting issues such as poor quality, inadequate lace hooks, and wetness inside. The majority of customers found the shoes to fit well right out of the box, but a few encountered difficulties due to high insteps or size discrepancies. Some buyers were pleased with the comfort and removal/replacement of their own orthotics, while others experienced discomfort from pressure on ankle tendons.

Durability

Customers have mixed opinions on the durability of the Propet Mens Cliff Walker Diabetic Shoe. While some customers praise its waterproof feature, strong construction, and longevity, others report issues with the sole coming off, leather deteriorating, lace guides tearing the outer casing, and metal eyelets digging into their feet after a few months of use.

Was this feature helpful?

Highlights

The AI used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

Quality

Boots fit awesome, well made, warm, provide great traction.

They are well constructed all leather hiking boots that should last a long time with proper care.

The first pair lasted several years and the glue in the sole finally gave way and the smmoth surface of the boot had cracks in it.

The refund came after about a week

Price

These were a perfect fit for my extra wide feet right out of the box, and they didn't have an exorbitant price.

Most hiking boots are limited to medium or wide, and getting them extra wide comes at a premium cost.

So, when i saw the price go down a bit, i bought another pair.

Packaging/appearance

Purchased and hiked in them right out of the box.

Competitiveness

I have also bought traverse as well as veymont hiking shoes.

Boots last twice as long as my other brand boots.

Overview

How are reviewers describing this item?
wide, fit, good, comfortable and great.

Our engine has detected that Amazon has altered, modified or removed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews altered up to 99.

Previous analysis of this listing was an D grade.

Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.

Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 72.1% of the reviews are reliable.

This product had a total of 1,354 reviews as of our last analysis date on Oct 17 2024.