Stansport Classifier/Sifter Pan

Analyzed on

1,652Total Reviews

Camping & Hiking

B

Company Review Grade:

Stansport

352 Total Products

Stansport Classifier/Sifter Pan

Analyzed on

Sold by Stansport

D

Fakespot review grade

D

What does this mean?

Fakespot Adjusted Rating

Insufficient reliable reviews

Amazon Rating

Ask Fakespot Chat questions about this productAlpha

Initializing Fakespot Chat

System error,

Loading suggested questions

Suggested Questions

No suggested questions were found

Please note: The content is generated by an AI language model based on reviews. We are constantly improving the accuracy, however, its outputs may contain errors or offensive content from certain reviews. Please report any errors or offensive content to us. Also, please note that we will not collect your questions unless you click the thumbs up/down button to provide feedback. The answers displayed will be stored by us so if another Fakespotter asks a similar question we can provide them an answer faster. Your feedback will only help us make Fakespot Chat better! By using Fakespot Chat, you agree to Fakespot's terms of use and privacy notice.

Pros & Cons

Update Pros and Cons

The AI used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

pros

See Details

pros

Features with many positive mentions

See Details

Build Quality

Customers are highly satisfied with the build quality of the Stansport Classifier/Sifter Pan, describing it as sturdy, solid, thick, and well-made.

Versatility

Customers are highly satisfied with the versatility of the Stansport Classifier/Sifter Pan, using it for various purposes such as panning for gold, separating rocks from soil, and even for outdoor activities with children. The black color is a popular feature that makes it easier to see the colors, while some customers prefer a green version due to personal preference. Overall, the pan is considered a great alternative to more expensive kits and is praised for its sturdiness and ease of use.

Durability

Customers have a very positive opinion on the durability of the Stansport Classifier/Sifter Pan. They describe it as sturdy, tough, lightweight, and long-lasting. Some customers have even used it for various purposes beyond gold panning and reported that it continues to perform well.

neutral

See Details

neutral

Frequently mentioned features with split sentiment

See Details

Efficiency

Customers have generally positive opinions on the efficiency of the Stansport Classifier/Sifter Pan, with many praising its ability to handle larger amounts of material and its usefulness in various applications such as gold panning, composting, and debris filtering. However, a small percentage of customers mentioned that it took a long time to clean off.

Was this feature helpful?

Highlights

The AI used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

Quality

We use this to help process sapphire bearing gravel, the mesh is strong and stands up well to dumping unsorted material to quic... Read More

Very sturdy, should last a long time.

The super sluice has too big of a flat bottom and rifles too hard that hold onto too much usless material when panning down.

To get the sticker off, i placed the pan in the microwave for 1 minute and it peeled right off leaving no residue.

Price

Worth the money for a great solution to sifting this type of litter

Easily beats the cost of a "real" kit.

I like because it works just fine good price at that

Price weight should work for agates and gold

Packaging/appearance

The first nice touch was a personalized, handwritten note in the package thanking me for my purchase.

Competitiveness

If you're looking for an alternative to a lyman pan, this is the ticket.

I know people have said that it didn't fit well on 5 gallon buckets from lowe's or home depot.

Overview

How are reviewers describing this item?
gold, great, good, fit and perfect.

Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is high deception involved.

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 34.8% of the reviews are reliable.

This product had a total of 1,652 reviews as of our last analysis date on Nov 25 2024.