What does this mean?Pros & Cons
Pros
Nadeau and kafatos say that in their wave structure, subatomic particles are extended infinitely throughout space and time. Since consciousness is an emergent process of the brain, it is not unreasonable to believe that the universe is conscious.
Nadeau and the logic of complementarity could be the logic of nature. They suggest that capra's ecological world view is consistent with modern physics.
Cons
This book propagates the same misinformation as many other bad science books such as the tao of physics. Lacanian psychoanalytic theory, marxist criticism, afrocentrism, is just not very informative to the casual reader. This book should be titled ali... Read More
Highlights
Quality
Toward the end of the book, they sketch capra's ecological world view, which is distinguishable in terms of five related shifts... Read More
This book describes the new physics of quantum entanglement and how human consciousness can emerge along with the natural world... Read More
It's perfectly ok reading a book like this and trying to grasp the fact that your consciousness is in some way entangled (as an... Read More
It means that there's something terribly wrong with the world and nobody has quite figured out what it is.
Packaging/appearance
There is something brilliant and understated about this book, that makes me want to pick it up every now and again and digest the contents.
Competitiveness
The intimate collective of all life on earth is described and how evolution proceeds more from cooperation than from competition.
Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
physical, new, whole and through. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
- Our engine has discovered that over 80% high quality reviews are present.
- This product had a total of 46 reviews as of our last analysis date on Oct 8 2022.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
However at the end of the day locality and nonlocality are simply points of view
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
You can priviledge one only by marginalizing the other like setting up your experiment to see a particle or a wave
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I hope that proponents of the local reality point of view are not suggesting john stewart bell author of the mathematical proof for nonlocality was a liar and a cheat
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It is tough going in places and gets somewhat disorganized later
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I skimmed sme and didnt understand some but i think it is about as clear as the subject permits
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I am always left to wonder quizzically at renewed hopes of finally bridging the cartesian divide for the problem is in part one of false terminology and the lack of selfperception more than selfdivision
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The great indian metaphysics of samkhya never had this problem because instead of two entities it had three all material
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The division of mind and matter is a confusion of terms and thus not open to solution by physics a most debatable point itself to be sure
Review Count History
Price History
Add Fakespot to your browser, Secure Shopping on the go.
Download Fakespot for Browsers
